Home Framework Threat Intel APT Encyclopedia Blog
Back to Blog
Series · Part 2 Jun 5, 2026 • 9 min read

The Detection-Validation Loop: From "I Ran It" to "We Caught It"

Running an attack is the easy half. The hard, valuable half is proving whether your defenses saw it. This is how Cyllex closes that loop — and why it's the part of the framework I care about most.

Detection Validation SIEM Gap Analysis Purple Team

In Part 1 I described Cyllex as "execute a technique, then check whether your defenses saw it." This post is about that second clause — the detection-validation loop — because it's what separates a purple-team tool from an attack tool.

Logged vs. Detected: Two Different Questions

Before anything else, a distinction that matters more than people expect. When you run a technique, there are two things you might be validating:

These are not the same. You can have perfect logging and zero detections, or an alert that fired off a single weak signal. Cyllex treats telemetry as the ground floor — if the events aren't there, no rule can ever catch it — and builds the verdict up from there.

How the Loop Works

Every technique in Cyllex ships with detection metadata: the telemetry it's expected to produce — Windows/Sysmon event IDs, cloud audit events, the log table and fields. After a campaign runs, Cyllex uses that metadata to go ask your SIEM a precise question, scoped to the exact time window of the execution.

  1. Execute the technique (agent, agentless, or cloud).
  2. Wait for the SIEM to ingest events (seconds for endpoint, minutes for cloud).
  3. Correlate — Cyllex queries the SIEM for the expected telemetry in the execution window.
  4. Classify — turn the result into a per-technique verdict.
Campaign correlation run
Correlating a finished campaign against the configured SIEM.

The Four-State Verdict

Each technique lands in one of four states, so the result is honest rather than binary:

That last state matters: a tool that reports "Not Detected" when it simply didn't know what to look for produces misleading coverage numbers. Cyllex keeps "we couldn't check" separate from "your SOC missed it."

Detection gap analysis
The gap view — detected, partial and missed techniques across a campaign.

Two Detection Models, One Engine

Not all telemetry behaves the same, so Cyllex classifies with two models depending on the data source:

Same loop, same report; the classifier just reflects how each kind of telemetry actually works.

From Gaps to Fixes

A gap report is only useful if it tells you what to do next. For undetected techniques, Cyllex drafts Sigma rule suggestions and maps findings to detection-maturity scoring and control frameworks — so the output is a prioritized to-do list for the blue team, not just a red/green grid.

Correlation can run automatically after a campaign, so the loop is hands-off: schedule the run, and the detection report is waiting for you.

Next in the series

Part 3: Cloud Purple Teaming — closing the loop in Azure, AWS and GCP.